<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does a $100million TV show look like?</title>
	<link>http://www.shootingbynumbers.com/2008/07/05/what-does-a-100million-tv-show-look-like/</link>
	<description>value added video shooting by numbers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelP</title>
		<link>http://www.shootingbynumbers.com/2008/07/05/what-does-a-100million-tv-show-look-like/#comment-661</link>
		<author>MichaelP</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shootingbynumbers.com/2008/07/05/what-does-a-100million-tv-show-look-like/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Count me out. I thought the clever camera work was really distracting. Shaky cam just doenst do it for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me out. I thought the clever camera work was really distracting. Shaky cam just doenst do it for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.shootingbynumbers.com/2008/07/05/what-does-a-100million-tv-show-look-like/#comment-660</link>
		<author>peter</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shootingbynumbers.com/2008/07/05/what-does-a-100million-tv-show-look-like/#comment-660</guid>
		<description>It's going to be interesting to see whether this creates a trend that others will feel compelled to follow. I think the plethora of canted shots gave the production a lot of life - but a very different aesthetic to most hand-held cinematography - it was a very lavish production with a lush feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see whether this creates a trend that others will feel compelled to follow. I think the plethora of canted shots gave the production a lot of life - but a very different aesthetic to most hand-held cinematography - it was a very lavish production with a lush feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jaye</title>
		<link>http://www.shootingbynumbers.com/2008/07/05/what-does-a-100million-tv-show-look-like/#comment-657</link>
		<author>Michael Jaye</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shootingbynumbers.com/2008/07/05/what-does-a-100million-tv-show-look-like/#comment-657</guid>
		<description>I was not enthralled a by the episodes I saw because the story line seemed to drag. But I think it's certainly caused me to look more critically at the  BBC down the line style of historical productions. They seem somehow flat when they follow the conventions so slavishly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not enthralled a by the episodes I saw because the story line seemed to drag. But I think it&#8217;s certainly caused me to look more critically at the  BBC down the line style of historical productions. They seem somehow flat when they follow the conventions so slavishly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
